Gender, visual status determine differences in viewing distances of smartphones

Article

An increase in popularity of the use of handheld electronics is resulting in changes in the postural and behavioral patterns of device users, as well as significant differences between presbyopes and non-presbyopes and between genders.

An increase in popularity of the use of handheld electronics is resulting in changes in the postural and behavioral patterns of device users, as well as significant differences between presbyopes and non-presbyopes and between genders.


An analysis of features that possibly affect viewing distances when using smartphones by individuals of different age groups in different postures found significant differences between presbyopes and non-presbyopes and between males and females, according to Laura Boccardo, professor, Institute for Research and Study in Optics and Optometry, Vinci, Italy, and School of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences (Optics and Optometry), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

As she explained, the phenomenal increase in popularity of the use of handheld electronics such as smartphones and tablets is resulting in changes in the postural and behavioral patterns of the device users as well as the resultant variety of viewing styles and body postures among smartphone users.

Related: Pupil size matters in presbyopia treatment

While younger individuals have been widely using smartphones for years, recently, she pointed out, “there has been significant growth in tech adoption also among the older generation, and the age gap in smartphone ownership has been closing since 2015.”

Regarding presbyopia, the decreased amplitude of accommodation with age results in different visual problems when using smartphones.

Because of this, she conducted a cross-sectional observational study1 both to measure habitual viewing distances with smartphones among individuals of different ages, i.e., those under 39 years and presbyopes over 40 years, and identify the factors that affect the viewing distance.

Related: The next frontier of presbyopia treatments

Viewing distance study
She evaluated gender, reading position, forearm length, ametropia, correction modality, and near vision quality as potential factors affecting the viewing distances used with smartphones among 233 study participants (129 females, 104 males).

The individuals ranged in age from 16 to 90 years and they were divided by their visual status, presbyopic (n=102; range, 42 to 90 years) and non-presbyopic (n=131; range, 16 to 39 years).

All participants read a text message on their own smartphone while sitting and standing.

The overall viewing distances of all participants were 36.1 ± 7.2 cm while sitting and 37.4 ± 6.8 cm while standing, a difference that reached significance (p < 0.05) and 36.8 ± 6.6 cm overall.

When broken down by visual status, the average viewing distance was 35.0 ± 6.4 cm among non-presbyopes and 39.0 ± 6.1 cm among presbyopes, which also reached significance (p < 0.05).

Related: The many options of vision correction

Among females, the average viewing distance was 34.7 ± 6.2 cm and 38.2 ± 6.3 cm among the males, also a significant difference (p < 0.001).

The takeaway points were that differences between males and females were seen because of the different average body sizes of the genders, the average viewing distance in presbyopes was about the same as the typical near reading distance (40 cm), and the accommodative demand among non-presbyopes using a smartphone was slightly greater compared with presbyopes.

Boccardo also noted that there was high variability in both age groups and no significant correlations seen with the other factors that were assessed.

See more presbyopia content

Reference
1. Boccardo L. Viewing distance of smartphones in presbyopic and non-presbyopic age. J Optom 2021;14:120-6; DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.08.001

Recent Videos
Jessica Steen, OD, FAAO, Dipl-ABO, discussed ophthalmic considerations for patients undergoing treatment with antibody drug conjugates for gynecologic cancers at this year's conference.
A. Paul Chous, MA, OD, FAAO, details a presentation on this year's updates on diabetes given at this year's Academy meeting
Sherrol Reynolds, OD, FAAO, said that multimodel imaging has been a game changer in assessing the choroidal function and structural changes in various disease conditions.
Susan Gromacki, OD, FAAO, FSLS, provides key takeaways from this year's American Academy of Optometry symposium genetics and the cornea.
Roya Attar gives an overview of her presentation, "Decoding the Retina: The Value of Genetic Testing In Inherited Disorders," presented with Mohammad Rafieetary, OD, FAAO, FORS, ABO, ABCMO.
Ian Ben Gaddie, OD, FAAO, outlines key findings from a recent study evaluating lotilaner in patients with Demodex blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunction.
Clark Chang, OD, MSA, MSc, FAAO, discussed the complexities of diagnosing keratoconus in his Rapid Fire presentation given at the American Academy of Optometry 2024 meeting.
Mohammad Rafieetary, OD, FAAO, FORS, Dipl ABO, ABCMO, details the ease of genetic testing when diagnosing patients or reassessing a patient's diagnosis.
Gromacki, OD, FAAO, FSLS, emphasizes that corneal GP lenses remain an important part of a contact lens specialist's armamentarium
Mohammad Rafieetary, OD, FAAO, FORS, Dipl ABO, ABCMO, discusses diagnostic confusion that can be encountered when identifying macular edema in patients.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.