Many patients don’t understand electronic lab results

Article

A study from the University of Michigan found that many patients do not understand the significance of lab results that they receive electronically.

Ann Arbor, MI-A study from the University of Michigan found that many patients do not understand the significance of lab results that they receive electronically.

Patients are increasingly receiving test results outside of their doctor’s office as more doctors adopt electronic health records (EHR).

Doctors say EHR wastes time

The research team conducted an Internet survey asking more than 1,800 adults ages 40-70 to respond as though they had type 2 diabetes-nearly half of who did have the disease. The respondents were given displays showing test results for hemoglobin A1c as well as other blood tests. Participants were also given tests to measure their comprehension of numerical concepts and literacy skills.

According to researchers, people with low comprehension of numerical concepts and low literacy skills were less than half as likely to understand whether a lab result was inside or outside the reference ranges. As a result, they were also less able to use the results to decide whether or not they should call their doctor.

“We can spend all the money we want making sure that patients have access to their test results, but it won't matter if they don't know what to do with them,” says Brian Zikmund-Fisher, associate professor of health behavior and health education at the UM School of Public Health. “If we can design ways of presenting test results that make them intuitively meaningful, even for people with low numeracy and/or literacy skills, such data can help patients take active roles in managing their health care. In fact, improving how we show people their health data may be a simple but powerful way to improve health outcomes.”

Newsletter

Want more insights like this? Subscribe to Optometry Times and get clinical pearls and practice tips delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Videos
Matt Jones, OD; Matt Burns, OD; and Joe Sugg, OD; detailed what optometrists can expect to change when HB 1353's regulations are enacted later this year.
Arkansas Optometric Association legislative cochairs Matt Jones, OD; Matt Burns, OD; and Joe Sugg, OD, discuss their involvement in their bill and provide context for its relevance.
Elise Kramer, OD, FAAO, FSLS, describes her take on a multidisciplinary approach to dry eye
Dana Shannon, OD, FAAO, shares pearls on spotting red flags in need of referral and enhancing patient care with follow-up compliance.
Dana Shannon, OD, FAAO, detailed a lecture she gave at the NOA Midwestern Symposium earlier this month.
CRU 2025 provided the latest insights regarding glaucoma, dry eye disease, retina, myopia, neurotrophic keratitis, and keratoconus.
Rachelle Lin, OD, MS, FAAO
Paul Karpecki, OD, FAAO
Melissa Barnett, OD, FAAO, FSLS, FBCLA, gave 2 presentations alongside other ODs and MDs at CRU 2025.
Rachelle Lin, OD, MS, FAAO, at CRU Eye Symposium 2025
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.