New near VA card facilitates accurate self-monitoring of vision by patients

News
Article

The Hadassah Self-Visual Acuity Screener (HSVA) has high test–retest reliability, accuracy, and alignment with clinical-standard VA tests, according to a study conducted by its developers.

Woman taking visual acuity test Image Credit: AdobeStock/NicholasFelix/peopleimages.com

Image Credit: AdobeStock/NicholasFelix/peopleimages.com

A newly developed near visual acuity (VA) card, the Hadassah Self-Visual Acuity Screener (HSVA), exhibits high test–retest reliability, accuracy, and alignment with clinical-standard VA tests. Its performance indicated that it is suitable for self-monitoring by patients with chronic ocular conditions or those without easy access to conventional visual examinations.1

The VSVA was developed by Hadas Ben-Eli, PhD, and colleagues from the Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, and the Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.

The study authors credited the emergence of telemedicine for the rise in interest in creating dependable self-administered VA tests for use beyond standard clinical environments. In their study they evaluated the practicality and validity of a self-administered near VA card test compared with traditional Snellen and Rosenbaum Pocket Vision Screener (RPVS) methods for home monitoring and enhancing the workflow in clinical practices.

The investigators conducted a cross-sectional study in which they developed the HSVA that includes written and videotaped instructions for self-use by patients. The study recruited patients from ophthalmology and optometry clinics who had a minimal best-corrected VA (BCVA) of 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in at least 1 eye. The study outcomes were the mean BCVA difference between the self-administered values and those obtained by the examiner, correlations between the BCVA values obtained using the Snellen, the Rosenbaum Pocket Vision Screener, HSVA, and previous distance BCVA methods, the authors recounted.

Results of testing

The 275 participants (47% women) in the study were a mean age of 42.5; range, 18-89 years.

Dr. Ben-Eli and colleagues reported, “The test–retest reliability analysis of the HSVA demonstrated very good correlation and repeatability (n = 38 patients; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [Rs] = 1.0; p < 0.001).”

The mean logMAR BCVA values of an additional 237 patients obtained using the Snellen, RPVS, and HSVA methods showed similar accuracy (p = 0.10).

The results of the patient self-testing of their BCVA using the HSVA agreed with the masked examiner-tested VA results (n = 67 patients; p = 0.17; Rs = 0.87; intra-class correlation coefficients = 0.96). In addition, similar results were obtained when the patients were stratified based on the median age (42 years).

The HSVA and RPVS methods showed good agreement.

The authors assessed if the HSVA could predict the VA results in the clinically used charts and found that the HSVA predicted the RPVS results (β = 0.91; p = 0.001; R2 = 0.88), and the self-test HSVA predicted the Snellen VA results within 2 lines (β = 0.93; p = 0.01; R2 = 0.36).

The investigators concluded, “The home-based HSVA assessment exhibited high test–retest reliability, accuracy, and alignment with clinical-standard VA tests. Its efficacy in self-testing mirrored examiner-conducted VA assessments and accurately predicted Snellen VA outcomes, indicating the HSVA’s suitability for self-monitoring in chronic ocular conditions or when access to conventional examinations is limited. The utility of self-administered VA tests may extend beyond ophthalmology and optometry, potentially benefiting primary care, emergency medicine, and neurology. Further research is needed to explore and validate the practical applications of remote VA testing.”

Reference:
  1. Ben-Eli H, Banin E, Levy J, et al. Development and evaluation of a new self-administered near visual acuity chart: accuracy and feasibility of usage. J Clin Med.2024;13:2064; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072064

Newsletter

Want more insights like this? Subscribe to Optometry Times and get clinical pearls and practice tips delivered straight to your inbox.

Recent Videos
Matt Jones, OD; Matt Burns, OD; and Joe Sugg, OD; detailed what optometrists can expect to change when HB 1353's regulations are enacted later this year.
Dana Shannon, OD, FAAO, shares pearls on spotting red flags in need of referral and enhancing patient care with follow-up compliance.
Dana Shannon, OD, FAAO, detailed a lecture she gave at the NOA Midwestern Symposium earlier this month.
Melissa Barnett, OD, FAAO, FSLS, FBCLA, gave 2 presentations alongside other ODs and MDs at CRU 2025.
Melissa Tawa, OD, FAAO, provides insights to take glaucoma management from reactive to proactive in presentations given at CRU 2025 in Napa, California.
Rachelle Lin, OD, MS, FAAO, details her presentation on inherited retinal diseases at CRU 2025.
Jennifer Li, MD, details a talk she gave alongside Melissa Barnett, OD, FAAO, FSLS, FBCLA, at CRU 2025 in Napa, California.
Deb Ristvedt, DO, details a handful of presentations on glaucoma she gave during CRU 2025 in Napa, California.
Cecelia Koetting, OD, FAAO, DipABO, weighs in on patient assessments, staining pattern insights, and diagnostic tips for patients who may have dry eye disease.
Melissa Barnett, OD, FAAO, FSLS, FBCLA, discusses keratoconus management, diagnosis, and other key insights at CRU 2025.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.