Study evaluates the potential correlation of ultra-processed food consumption and increased glaucoma incidence

News
Article

UPFs include fast food, energy drinks and soda, sweets such as chocolates and candies, and much more.

Array of fast food, sugary sweets, pizza Image Credit: AdobeStock/beats_

Image Credit: AdobeStock/beats_

A recent study of Spanish university students showed those who intake a higher amount of ultra-processed food (UPF) have a higher risk of developing glaucoma when compared to those with a lower UPF consumption.

The study used data from the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) Project conducted in 1999, a large prospective cohort study that focuses on Spanish university graduates in a Mediterranean setting to identify the lifestyle and dietary variables that contribute to various diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, mental illness, and cancer. The sample size consisted of 19,225 participants (60.1% women) with a mean age of 38.2 years old (±12.4). Participants were followed up on average for 12.9 years (±5.4). An ophthalmologist clinically evaluated a subsample of 150 participants to validate the self-reported diagnosis of glaucoma.1

UPFs were defined by using the NOVA classification system, designed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. By the NOVA system, UPF is defined as “industrial formulations made entirely or mostly from substances extracted from foods (oils, fats, sugar, starch, and proteins), derived from food constituents (hydrogenated fats and modified starch), or synthesized in laboratories from food substrates or other organic sources (flavor enhancers, colors, and several food additives used to make the product hyper-palatable).”2

Examples of UPFs according to the NOVA System include, but are not limited to:

  • Energy drinks and sodas
  • Distilled alcoholic beverages such as whisky, gin, rum, vodka, etc.
  • Cookies
  • Fatty, sweet, savory, or salty packaged snacks
  • Pre-prepared pizza and pasta dishes
  • Pre-prepared (packaged) meat, fish and vegetables
  • Chocolates, candies and confectionery in general
  • Canned, packaged, dehydrated (powdered), and other ‘instant’ soups, noodles, sauces, desserts, drink mixes, and seasonings

In the SUN project, dietary intake was measured at the beginning using a 136-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and was repeated after 10 years to account for any changes in the participant’s diet.

For the study evaluating UPF intake and glaucoma association, participants were divided into 4 groups according to the daily number of servings of UPFs consumed, Group 1 consisted of those consuming 1 serving or less (n=1004), Group 2 more than 1 to 3 servings (n=8237), Group 3 more than 3 to 4 servings (n=4196), and Group 4 more than 4 servings (n=5818).1

Results showed that participants in Group 4 were at higher risk of glaucoma (Hazard Ratio = 1.84; 95% Confidence Interval 1.06 to 3.21) compared to participants in Group 1 (p for trend = 0.005). Furthermore, when analyzed independently, UPF from sweets showed a significant glaucoma risk when compared to sausage, beverage, fried food, fast food, and dairy product consumption.1

The study concluded that a possible explanation for the findings could lie in the increase in blood glucose levels caused by higher UPF consumption and hypothesized that increased consumption of UPFs, rich in additives and artificial substances, may increase inflammation levels, which, in turn, could increase the risk of glaucoma.

References:
  1. López-Gil JF, Fernandez-Montero A, Bes-Rastrollo M, Moreno-Galarraga L, Kales SN, Martínez-González MÁ, Moreno-Montañés J. Is Ultra-Processed Food Intake Associated with a Higher Risk of Glaucoma? A Prospective Cohort Study including 19,255 Participants from the SUN Project. Nutrients. 2024; 16(7):1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16071053
  2. The NOVA Food Classification System. Food, Nutrition & Fitness I: The Digestion Journey Begins with Food Choices Compiled in 2018 by EduChange with guidance from NUPENS, Sao Paulo. https://ecuphysicians.ecu.edu/wp-content/pv-uploads/sites/78/2021/07/NOVA-Classification-Reference-Sheet.pdf
Recent Videos
Abby Gillogly Harsch, OD, FAAO, FSLS, shares a specific complex case of scleral lens fitting that she presented on at this year's GSLS.
Sherrol Reynolds, OD, FAAO, values the ophthalmic-optometric collaboration on display at the summit, running from February 14-17, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Katie Rachon, OD, FAAO, Dipl ABO, shares her excitement for the upcoming conference and what it means for an optometrist's toolbox.
From contact lens dropout to addressing diabetic retinopathy in rural communities, optometrists choose an area of eye care research that they would expand, given the appropriate resources.
From new treatments on the horizon for macular degeneration to strengthening comanagement ties, optometrists cite a lot to be excited about in the coming year.
Practice owners testify to the importance of trying new things, not being afraid to fail, and utilizing community as a resource when starting up a new practice.
Optometrists reflect on their residency experiences and provide advice to current residents.
In 2 weeks, the study participant's dry eye symptoms improved from 76 to 43 on a 0-100 rating scale, according to Marc-Matthias Schulze, PhD, Dipl Ing.
Eye care practitioners reported moderate to high satisfaction with lifitegrast's ability to improve signs of dry eye, according to Melissa Barnett, OD, FAAO, FSLS.
Neda Gioia, OD, CNS, FOWNS, details the positive feedback gained so far from other optometrists that have been prescribing the NutriTears supplement to their dry eye patients.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.