Treatments evolve for retinal vein occlusions

Article

Vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular entity (diabetic retinopathy is the most common).

Key Points

In the past, treatment was limited to specific patients and showed modest efficacy.2,3 Recent clinical trials, however, have resulted in more frequent use of agents that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), intravitreal steroid injections, and FDA approval of a new steroid implant. These treatment options offer new hope for patients with macular edema secondary to central and branch retinal vein occlusion (CRVO and BRVO, respectively).

Two of the largest studies that looked at the treatment of macular edema in patients with vein occlusion date back more than 20 years. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study (BVOS) and Central Vein Occlusion Study (CVOS) evaluated focal laser for the treatment of macular edema associated with BRVO and CRVO.2,3

The CVOS looked at subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/50 or poorer. Treated subjects showed angiographic evidence of improvement, but there was no improvement in visual acuity.3

Intravitreal steroid injection

Many small-scale studies and case reports show a potential benefit of intravitreal ster-oid injections for treating macular edema associated with BRVO and CRVO.4,5

To date, the Standard Care versus COrticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Trial is the largest study that has compared intravitreal steroid injection with standard-of-care treatment (macular grid laser for BRVO, observation for CRVO) for macular edema associated with vein occlusion. Researchers randomly assigned about 700 subjects to receive standard-of-care treatment, a 1-mg intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog), or 4 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Subjects were evaluated and re-treatment was assessed every 4 months.6,7

The SCORE-BRVO 3-year study determined that laser was most effective for treating macular edema associated with BRVO. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome when comparing patients who received intravitreal steroid injection with those treated with laser. At 3 years, 29% of the patients treated with laser experienced three or more lines in improved visual acuity, as did 26% of those who received 1 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and 27% of those who received 4 mg.6 Also, there was a greater incidence of cataract formation and increased IOP among patients treated with steroids.6

Recent Videos
Dr Jamie Kuzniar discusses higher order aberrations and premium scleral lenses
Abby Gillogly Harsch, OD, FAAO, FSLS, shares a specific complex case of scleral lens fitting that she presented on at this year's GSLS.
Sherrol Reynolds, OD, FAAO, values the ophthalmic-optometric collaboration on display at the summit, running from February 14-17, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Katie Rachon, OD, FAAO, Dipl ABO, shares her excitement for the upcoming conference and what it means for an optometrist's toolbox.
EnVision Summit Cochair Cecelia Koetting, OD, FAAO, Dipl ABO, says that attendees should get ready for more discussion-based panels at this year's conference.
From contact lens dropout to addressing diabetic retinopathy in rural communities, optometrists choose an area of eye care research that they would expand, given the appropriate resources.
Bonnie An Henderson in an interview for the EnVision Summit
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.