Which is better: one or two?

Article

Answering the question: “Which is better, one or two?" can lead to some confusion on the patient’s part.

There is a standard line in our profession: “Which is better, one or two?”

This usually refers to the optometrist refining the cylinder axis and power by flipping the Jackson cross-cylinder lens and asking the patient which of the two lens choices improves his vision, hence the question: “Which is better, one or two?”

Dr. BowlingI’ve found over the course of my career that this choice, while meant to improve the patient’s vision, can also lead to some confusion on the patient’s part. I used to use only “choice 1 or choice 2,” but have modified that option to include the alphabet, Disney characters, movie star names, cars, and anything else that might grab the patient’s attention. I found that when I taught optometry, students droned on monotonically: “Which… is… better… one…or …two?”

Listening to them drove me crazy. So I always recall this story:

Once upon a time, when I was in private practice in Georgia, I had a very nice little old lady, Mrs. Smith, present for an eye exam. Mrs. Smith’s refraction was especially difficult, partially because of her cataracts and especially because of her habitual indecision. After much effort and way too much time, we managed to get through the refraction, and the rest of the exam proceeded smoothly.

Later that night, I was sitting at home watching a football game when the phone rang.

“Hello?” I answered.

“Dr. Bowling?”

“Yes.”

“It’s Mrs. Smith from the office today. Do you remember me?”

“Why, yes, Mrs. Smith. How could I forget you?” That was the truth. “What can I do for you this evening?”

“Well, Doctor, I’ve been thinking. Today, you kept asking me which was better-one or two. I kept telling you one. But now, the more I think about it, I’m certain it was two.”

“Thank you for telling me that, Mrs. Smith. I’ll make the necessary changes to your record in the morning.”

“Well, OK,Dr. Bowling. I was certain you’d want to know.”

“That was sweet of you to call, Mrs. Smith. Thank you.”

I’ve never used that particular combination of choices since.

Recent Videos
Sherrol Reynolds, OD, FAAO, said that multimodel imaging has been a game changer in assessing the choroidal function and structural changes in various disease conditions.
Susan Gromacki, OD, FAAO, FSLS, provides key takeaways from this year's American Academy of Optometry symposium genetics and the cornea.
Roya Attar gives an overview of her presentation, "Decoding the Retina: The Value of Genetic Testing In Inherited Disorders," presented with Mohammad Rafieetary, OD, FAAO, FORS, ABO, ABCMO.
Ian Ben Gaddie, OD, FAAO, outlines key findings from a recent study evaluating lotilaner in patients with Demodex blepharitis and meibomian gland dysfunction.
Clark Chang, OD, MSA, MSc, FAAO, discussed the complexities of diagnosing keratoconus in his Rapid Fire presentation given at the American Academy of Optometry 2024 meeting.
Mohammad Rafieetary, OD, FAAO, FORS, Dipl ABO, ABCMO, details the ease of genetic testing when diagnosing patients or reassessing a patient's diagnosis.
Gromacki, OD, FAAO, FSLS, emphasizes that corneal GP lenses remain an important part of a contact lens specialist's armamentarium
Mohammad Rafieetary, OD, FAAO, FORS, Dipl ABO, ABCMO, discusses diagnostic confusion that can be encountered when identifying macular edema in patients.
Nate Lighthizer, OD, FAAO, overviews a handful of YAG laser procedures in his AAOpt presentation.
Susan Gromacki, OD, MS, FAAO, FSLS, details a panel that provided a complete course on keratoconus.
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.